Will there be different standards and expectations for different blogosphere communities? For example, do you distinguish between individual blogs with a single voice and group or corporate blogs? Even within individual blogs, there must be different levels of expectation for the personal musings blog, the citizen journalist blog, the industry expert blog, the enthusiast blog, or the CEO blog.

If you spend a lot of time reading, commenting and/or writing blogs, it’s easy to assume that the blogosphere standards are universal. But when I step away from my computer and go out and talk to people, I find almost universal ignorance of a blog ethic. Whether I talk to students, or to engineers, or to managers ranging from manufacturing to services, I find many who read about blogs and hear about blogs in the mainline media. But very few say they actually read blogs. Fewer still get RSS feeds, or know what it is. Almost none have commented on a blog. I find far more students actively involved with social media like Facebook, MySpace and YouTube than with blogs. If blogging is to continue its torrid rate of growth, it seems to me the blogosphere may be approaching the point where it transitions from a small village ethic to a multi-layered urban ethic. What’s your take?

http://www.iaocblog.com/blog/_archives/2006/9/21/2347275.html

http://www.iaocblog.com/blog/_archives/2006/9/19/2341167.html

But practicality rules. A lot of CEOs (most?) are not naturally talented writers. Many don’t have the time or don’t want to spend the time to write the blog.

So… given the reality of blog editors and/or ghostbloggers for CEOs and other senior executives, should the ghostblogger reveal him or herself?

This could be done by a disclaimer on the blog. Or via the “bio link” of the CEO blogger at the bottom of each post. For example, you might click on the CEO’s name and up would pop a mini bio and words to the effect of:

“Hi, I’m Sally Top Dog. I’m excited about sharing my ideas, thoughts and observations with you. As you can appreciate, I’m pretty busy running XYZ Corp. So I’m delighted to introduce Bob Blogger, my not-so-secret ghostblogger. Bob and I talk frequently and you can be sure that all the content of this blog originates with me. Bob does a super job of translating my ideas into fun and provocative prose. Thanks Bob!”

Er, now that I’ve written that, I don’t know if it really works. So, fire away. Waddya think? Should a ghostblogger for a CEO reveal  himself and if so, how?

—What would you think if Bill Gates finished a speech with “By the way, I didn’t really write this speech, but I agree with everything it says”?!

Ghostwriting is not co-authoring or even “as told to.” It’s a virtual extension of the alleged “writer.” It’s a spurious honesty to disavow one’s own blog. Even if “one” didn’t write it. Sorry to say this, but blogging is too new a “tradition” to have developed such a rigid code of ethics. Better worry about the honesty of the “content.”

—I have written for CEOs in the past who had a distinctive style and clear opinions. They provided sufficient input before I started writing so that I found it easy to write in their voice. They have the ideas and the passion to provide plenty of blog material, with or without a ghost. I have written for others (not for long) who had no style and took no clear stand on anything. Those with no sense of humor would want you to write jokes for them. Definitely not blogging material, with or without a ghost.

One executive stands out in my mind (pre-blog era) who was a good writer in his own right but didn’t have the time to do it all himself. Interestingly, he was far less prone to rewrite other people’s work than those more communication-challenged executives. He may have been an exception, but if I were writing a CEO blog for him it would be very much his blog. Of course he also would likely have chosen to share the credit publicly. (Don Dunnington)

—While I can be fanatical about the need for authenticity and honesty in organisational communications, I think that the problem lies not so much in the disclosure of a ghost-blogger but in the attribution of the blog itself.

If it’s supposed to be the words of our leader then disclosing that it’s actually someone else’s words detracts – unless it’s with the proviso that it’s “dictated” or similar. “Written by X from our conversations” isn’t the leader’s words. It’s someone’s reporting/interpretation.

If you’ve got a leader who’s sufficiently human, you could always try “and X corrects my grammar, spelling and makes my thoughts intelligible” – but that’s a big ask of any leader’s ego.

I think it’s also an internal/external thing – although either way is it better to brand it as something other than their personal “bon mots”. Why not “From the Office of YYYYY” – at least that gives the flexibility of having other people blog on ideas that clearly stem from the top? (Tony)

—Blogs aren’t speeches.

Also, I’d like to tackle the notion of “blog purists” (an amorphous group that’s been mentioned more than a few times). As far as I’m concerned, there’s no place for ‘em. Blogging is too new and the rules are still being written. Applying real-world common sense is what we’re doing here, and that’s what will carry the day in the end.

Finally, the critical issue (addressed only in passing) are the PR issues for any CEO whose blog is ghostwritten. If they’re “unmasked” the consequences would be grave (and I envision this kind of thing becoming a professional sport for reporters in pretty short order); public perception would indeed be that they had been “pretending”, cynically using this new media to garner favourable press attention.

 Print Article
–>

CEOs and their respective brands have long been scared about blogs because of their inherent open nature. Because they are forever preserved on the internet. Because they may have comments that are less than complimentary. So what? Through engaging you build relationships. Through relationships you do business. Through good busines you build advocates. If you’ve done this, you have a successful business.

http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/blogspotting/archives/2006/09/should_ceos_blo.html

But Schwartz insists that blogging helps him do his job, which involves communicating with employees, suppliers and customers. So why not believe him? Debbie Weil does.

For CEOs, I don’t think it’s not a question of whether they should or shouldn’t blog. It’s simply a tool that’s available to them if they choose. How they use it is up to them. Maybe a CEO only posts twice a month. That’s OK. Maybe she assigns someone to moderate comments and deal with trolls. Maybe the blog circulates only internally. That’s fine (though leaks to the outside are likely). The point is, a few CEOs, including Schwartz, will be figuring out what works and what doesn’t. Meanwhile, the vast majority of CEOs, agreeing with Taylor, will leave the blogging to others.

http://www.businessweek.com/the_thread/blogspotting/archives/2006/09/should_ceos_blo.html

My short answer is: “Don’t.”

First, it is usually unwise and occasionally career-shortening to try to force your CEO to do anything he does not wish to do. Second, with very few exceptions, CEOs do not make the best company bloggers.  Product managers and other people who are passionate and knowledgeable about the details of a product are often better.

CEOs of public companies are hamstrung by security and other regulatory restrictions.  Even if the company is private, the CEO’s primary accountability is to investors.  A product manager, on the other hand, is mostly loyal to his or her product and accountable to customers. The CEO’s future is tied to company growth and profits.  The product manager’s is often tied to happy customers.

Product managers also speak in a language closer to everyday people.  While their are many exceptions, most CEOs are fluent in corpspeak a language most of us neither trust nor understand.

The bottom line:  CEOs should nurture cultures that encourage blogging. They should encourage the open culture and using blogs to get closer with customers.

Let them spend what little spare time they have with their families or playing golf.

http://redcouch.typepad.com/weblog/2006/03/maybe_your_ceo_.html

So why in the world would CEOs take on the extra task of blogging—a communication medium with a tentative ROI that remains largely unproven?

Marketing pundit and best-selling author Seth Godin says they shouldn’t. According to Godin, blogs work when they are based on candor, urgency, timeliness, pithiness, and controversy. “Does this sound like a CEO to you?  Godin asks. “Short and sweet, folks: If you can’t be at least four of the five things listed above, please don’t bother . . . save the fluff for the annual report.

As blogging evolves, however, many of today’s CEOs-turned-bloggers in fact are making the time—and having a good time—using the very characteristics Godin lists as what makes blogging successful.

 In the following one month, I would like to discuss more on Whether or not our CEOs should blog.

Yes, because many webloggers are influential individuals with detailed industry knowledge(many are themselves professional journalists.)

No, because you should handle them with particular care. They are writing for their own interest and do not want to feel subject to any outside, commercial interests. By all means engage them in dialogue on their chosen topics, but beware of ‘pitching’ them with your own stories. You should certainly monitor the more influential weblogs covering your area(you can gauge the influence by  metric such as Google PageRank, a measure of other pages that link to this one in a form of online peer review).

- Bailey, R(2006) Media Relations, Exploring Public Relations, Tench, R. & Yeomans, L.(ed.), Prentice Hall.310-330

Guy Kawasaki: [Here's] speech number two.  Fran told me that there are a lot of PR and marketing professionals in this audience. I grant you the power to criticize what I’m going to say, but this is what I’ve learned about PR in my career.

Create buzz, not ink.

The first thing is that the world has completely changed in terms of buzz versus ink.  It used to be that if you got ink in places like Walt Mossberg’s column in The Wall Street Journal, or in The Industry Standard or Fortune or Forbes or Business Week, the ink would create buzz.  I believe that the world has completely reversed.  Today, if you get buzz¾if people are talking about you, if you’re getting 25 million people ripping off music with your software¾if you get buzz, you will get ink.  Journalists have no choice but to write about something that is a phenomenon.

          I will give you the secret to all of the evangelism and PR.  The answer is to create a great product because a great product creates buzz and great buzz creates ink.  That’s how it works.  This is called “Guy’s Golden Touch,” which is to say “whatever is gold, Guy touches.”  That’s very different from “whatever Guy touches turns to gold,” okay?  Create a great product.

Be one thing to all people.

Too much of PR and marketing is about being many things to many people.  You should be so lucky that you are absolutely identified with one particular thing.  Instead of trying a shotgun approach, you should try the rifle approach.  What do you want to be?  What specific thing?

          I’ll give you examples of specific things.  Macintosh.  No matter how much we tried to position Macintosh as powerful, Fortune 500, MIS compatible, IT compatible; Macintosh equals “ease of use.”  For years we spent tens of millions of dollars trying to prove how Macintosh was a Fortune 500 computer.  Macintosh equals ease of use. There’s nothing we could do about it, nothing we could do to reposition it.

          Second, Amazon equals books.  In my brain, when I think books, I think Amazon.  When I think CDs, I think someplace else; when I think auctions, I think someplace else; when I think electronics, I think someplace else.  Amazon equals books.  Go for that one thing.

          Third, Volvo equals safety. When you’re a parent who wants to drive a refrigerator, you buy a Volvo.  That’s how it works.  Volvo is not sexy.  Volvo is not high performance.  Volvo is not German.  Volvo is safety.  The key thing to realize is that you want to be one thing to all people.

Position, don’t be positioned.

The third thing is that you should never accept the positioning that the market and the press give you, determine what you want the positioning to be and set it your way.  This is a lesson that I learned the hard way recently.  For the past two years, Garage.com has been positioned as an incubator.  We were lumped together with ICG, CMGI, Divine InterVentures and IdeaLab!, but we are not an incubator. We don’t house people, we don’t provide receptionists to answer your phone, we don’t provide photocopies, we don’t provide anything like that. The difference between Garage.com and an incubator is roughly 40% in equity¾we take 40% less.  However, because there’s no category called “venture capital investment bank,” we’re always lumped together with the incubators.

          Now, I will grant you that if Divine InterVentures’ market cap today were $100 billion, I would be telling you that we’re an incubator, but it’s not, so we decided to go on an active positioning initiative.  Now we position ourselves as a “venture capital investment bank.”  An investment bank helps you raise money; we help you raise money just like Goldman Sachs helps you raise money.  Investment banks prepare you for a road show; we prepare you for a road show.  Investment banks beat you up on your business model; we beat you up on your business model.  Investment banks make you do your financials over and over, and we make you do your financials over and over.  We just specialize in raising venture capital.

          We actively positioned this.  When reporters call us and we give interviews, we talk about the company and we always specifically say, “When you do the Garage.com comma something something something comma, you always have to say “venture capital investment bank” to that level of specificity.  You tell the reporter that’s what you want in that clause between the commas.  When I speak, now, I require being introduced as “CEO of Garage.com comma a venture capital investment bank.”  You heard Fran do it. If he didn’t do it, I wouldn’t have spoken.  Do not accept the positioning of the marketplace.  Take the position you want and evangelize it.

Cascade.

Having achieved this positioning, you need to cascade it.  Lots of times the marketing department has achieved it, gotten it all clarified, worked with their consultants, etc., etc., and they say, “Boom.  Done.  Venture capital investment bank.  Everybody knows it.”  That’s not true.

          You need to cascade this position.  You need to tell all the other execs, “When somebody asks you what you are, you say ‘venture capital investment bank.’”  When you speak anywhere, you send them your bio and it says “Amy Vernetti, Director of Human Capital, Garage.com, a venture capital investment bank.”  No matter where you speak, everything is like that.  All your directors and advisors should also say it.  Your board of directors shouldn’t be saying, “Well, they’re kind of an incubator.”  It’s not a good idea for your board of directors to be saying something like that.  They should say “venture capital investment bank.”  And, of course, all your rank and file employees, right down to the shipping clerk, should be saying “venture capital investment bank.”  It would be nice if your Web site also echoed this and your press releases and your collateral.  The point is that once you decide on positioning, make sure it cascades through all your company.

Cut the crap.

There’s a lot of crap in PR today, and let me save you roughly $200,000 with this point.  First of all, you don’t need to do press conferences anymore.  If you’re Oracle or Microsoft, if you’re AOL, okay, do a press conference.  Rent a ballroom and spend $200,000 on wine and shrimp.  God bless you.  The press will come not because of the wine, not because of the shrimp and not because Huey Lewis is going to play at halftime.  They’re going to come because they have to come, because you’re a gorilla.  Unless you work for a gorilla, cut the press conferences because people don’t care about press conferences.  All they want, more than anything else, is a one-on-one interview with the CEO.  Give them that and it equals a press conference.  Save the money.  It also means you don’t have to do launch parties.  These $250,000 things at Comdex where you feed 1,000 of your competitors, they don’t make sense.  If you’re going to spend $250,000 on a launch party, buy a Porsche 911 Turbo for $125,000 because the next day the Turbo will still be there. Buy a great car and let the employees share it.

          You also don’t need to do paper press releases or paper press kits anymore.  I think those are passé.  What the editors and journalists really want is a one-page email press release.  That’s what they want, and they want it via email.  They don’t care about the press kit.  They don’t care about the 85-pound bond paper.  They don’t care about the CD-ROM.  They don’t care about the slides. They don’t care about the little robot that you send with the press kit that says, “If you want the control for this robot, call me.”  They don’t care about the basket of fruit because, quite frankly, most journalists are afraid to eat the fruit; they don’t know what’s in it.  Cut out the press releases and save trees, if nothing else.

Make friends before you need them.

This seems like a no-brainer, but I can tell you that very few people do it.  It is the key to the successful PR of Garage.com.  About 15 years ago, I started working at Apple and not because I was smart; I was just lucky. Back when Apple was hot¾and there was a time when Apple was hot, I don’t know if any of you are old enough to remember that¾we could pick who we worked with in the journalism world.  Sometimes we granted interviews to Fortune, sometimes we granted interviews to Forbes and The Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, but there were other, lesser publications that we didn’t grant interviews to because they were beneath our radar or the executives didn’t have time.  During that period of heightened arrogance at Apple Computer, I started working with all the journalists who were not at the very well-known publications.  I was working with the people who were reporters at The Milpitas Times and The Fremont Gazette.  You’ve never heard of those two publications, and you shouldn’t have.  Neither had I, quite frankly.   The interesting thing is that, in the past 15 years the reporters I worked with at places like The Fremont Gazette and The Milpitas Times, first they became business writers at The San Francisco Chronicle, then the West Coast correspondent for Business Week, then The Wall Street Journal’s West Coast Editor.  Now, I have all these friends who remember me as the person who helped them when they were nothing, and now they are something.  That’s why Garage.com gets so much good press.  I made all these relationships long before I needed them.  I wish I could tell you I was so sly and so smart and so insightful to have planned this, but I didn’t.  Make friends before you need them. 

Block and tackle.

I believe that PR is all about blocking and tackling.  It is not, as I said, about highfalutin’ press conferences; it is not about cute toys and gifts; it is not about anything that you’re trying to impress people with.  It is about blocking and tackling.  Let me give you examples of blocking and tackling.

          First, return people’s phone calls.  I can’t tell you how many CEOs do not return phone calls, even to The Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Forbes and The New York times.  Return their phone calls.  Return their phone call even if you know it’s going to be a negative thing.  That’s especially when you return the phone call.  If you have to, return the phone call at 9:00 at night when you know they’re not there¾at least you can leave a voice mail.  Play tricks, but return the voice mail, okay?

          Second, answer email.  You have to answer email.  If you want to have a good relationship with the press, you answer your email and you return their phone calls.

          Third, you never lie.  I have a policy of never lying, and the reason is not because of my high state of ethics, there’s a very practical reason for never lying.  Lying takes too much energy because, when you lie, you have to remember how you lied so you can lie consistently.  If you tell the truth, you don’t have to remember because the truth is the truth.  If for no other reason than that, don’t lie because you don’t have enough energy to maintain all the separate stories.  The bigger reason is, if you want credibility with the press, you cannot lie.  If you want to say, “Trust me on this one, it’s not as bad as it seems” when you’re losing money this quarter, you need to have established that credibility by ‘fessing up when it really was bad.  PR is a process; it is not an event.  Most people think that PR is an event where you meet with a person, you’re going to get a lot of ink and, boom, you’re done.  It’s not.  It’s a process that lasts for years and years.  If you lie, you will stop that process.

Read, then pitch; don’t pitch then read.

The way it really works in targeting is that you read a person’s prior work and then you pitch them a story.  Lots of PR is done the opposite way, however, which is you pitch a story then you read what they’ve done.  The reason why you read then pitch is that you need to find out who the real reporter is.  If you do PR for a semiconductor company, pitching Walt Mossberg at The Wall Street Journal to do a story about your new chip is probably not a good idea because he covers consumer gadgets.  He does not cover semiconductors, so you will look like a total bozo by pitching him on a semiconductor story.  You need to read what he does, then pitch a story to him.

Shoot bullets, not pellets.

PR is about shooting bullets from rifles, not pellets from shotguns.  It means that you read Walt Mossberg’s background and his prior work and you find out that he’s about consumer gadgets.  If I have a consumer gadget thing, I send it to him.  If I have a semiconductor story, there’s somebody else at The Wall Street Journal I send it to.  If I have a venture capital story, it’s Lisa Branston at The Wall Street Journal.  You shouldn’t try to blanket a news room, but lots of people do it anyway.  I was at The Washington Post yesterday and you can see this pit with about eight people in cubes all sort of facing each other.  If you send all eight people the same press release, what happens is that one of them stands up says, “Hey, did you get that press release about this thing?”  One will say yes, another will say yes and so on.  What happens is that they all assume that somebody else is writing the story because everybody in the newsroom got the press release.  You need to specifically identify and shoot a very specific bullet at the journalist you want.  Do not try to spray a newsroom.  It never, ever works and can mostly hurt you.

Be a “source.”

This has paid off for me over and over again.  You need to be a source for a journalist to help them write their stories.  The best attitude to have with a journalist is “I want to help you write your story.”  Your story may not be about me or our company.  It may not generate any ink for us, but I will help you be a better journalist.

          I have been a background source in countless stories.  You don’t want to know how many stories I’ve been in.  There used to be a magazine called MacWeek and they used to give a mug for every inside tip and leak.  I hold the record for the most mugs, and I help many, many reporters write stories, mostly on background.  Very recently, a reporter for The San Jose Mercury was writing a story about Silicon Valley pets.  I don’t have a pet, but I sent an email to my circle of friends asking if any of them had great pet stories.  One of them told me that in San Francisco there’s a daycare service where dot.com executives bring their dogs and cats in the morning, leave them for daycare all day and come back and get them.  That’s kind of a unique story, so I told it to the reporter and it appeared in her story about pets in Silicon Valley.  There was nothing about Garage.com in that story, but you know what?  Some day, when I need something from her, she will remember that I helped her with the Silicon Valley pet story.  You need to be a source.

          If you do these things, I swear, you will get lots of buzz and lots of press.  That’s speech number two.

http://www.netpreneur.org/Resources/PRTopTen.html